O
Durham
← Community
EnvironmentCommunity discussion

Riparian buffer protection standards

Durham

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Concerned (5)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Feb 5, 2026.

Public comments (6)

ConcernedPam AndrewsFeb 5, 2026

Requested greater public transparency and online accessibility for No Practical Alternatives Authorizations (NPAAs) affecting stream buffers.

Durham Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Commission - Feb 5, 2026 · 1:08:04 →
ConcernedDonna SteinbeckFeb 5, 2026

Expressed concern over the lack of early stream and buffer detail in development plans and called for more upfront information.

Durham Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Commission - Feb 5, 2026 · 1:09:50 →
ConcernedSamantha KroppFeb 5, 2026

Highlighted the frequency of NPAA approvals and advocated for better public tracking and daylighting of stream buffer impacts.

Durham Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Commission - Feb 5, 2026 · 1:40:36 →
ConcernedPam AndrewsFeb 5, 2026

Urged greater transparency and notification for No Practical Alternatives Authorizations (NPAAs) affecting stream buffers.

City Council (Work) - Feb 5, 2026 · 1:08:04 →
ConcernedDonna StainbackFeb 5, 2026

Expressed concerns about the transparency of stream buffer processes and the timing of stream diagram disclosures during development reviews.

City Council (Work) - Feb 5, 2026 · 1:10:02 →
SupportiveSamantha KroppFeb 5, 2026

Emphasized the importance of stream buffers and encouraged the city to create a public notification and mapping system for NPAAs similar to the state's process.

City Council (Work) - Feb 5, 2026 · 1:40:36 →